Fennel

How many times have we followed a trend just to fit in with the “cool kids” even if meant being untrue to ourselves? The reality is, many of us have fallen prey to peer pressure at some point. But individuals aren’t the only ones who conform to a trend to stay relevant. Businesses do too, and because ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) and sustainability are the hot topics of today, many companies partake in something called “greenwashing.”    <h4>Why greenwash?</h4> <a href="https://earth.org/what-is-greenwashing/">Greenwashing</a> is defined as the process of making misleading statements, in order to market a company or its products as being environmentally sustainable. <a href="https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/knowledge/other/greenwashing/">Some examples of greenwashing are</a>:  <ul> <li aria-level="1">Making vague or false environmental claims that are not backed up by hard evidence or third-party certifications </li> <li aria-level="1">Placing emphasis on irrelevant issues (for example, saying a phone is “CFC-free” when CFCs are already banned by law) </li> <li aria-level="1">Hiding “trade-offs” — essentially, highlighting small environmental victories in order to mask a larger, potentially more concerning issue (for example, banks advertising their issuing of sustainable bonds while financing companies that harm the environment) </li> </ul> Greenwashing is <a href="https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/are-companies-as-green-as-theyd-have-you-believe-2021-06-21">on the rise</a> as companies that boast of high ESG scores and sustainable practices are gaining traction in both financial and non-financial aspects. We’ve seen the S&P 500 ESG Index beat the S&P 500 Index <a href="https://www.spglobal.com/spdji/en/indices/esg/sp-500-esg-index/#overview">since the first market slump in early 2020</a>, <a href="https://www.reuters.com/business/sustainable-business/global-sustainable-bonds-see-record-issuance-jan-sept-2021-2021-10-12/">record issuance</a> of sustainable bonds in the year 2021, <a href="https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/McKinsey/Business%20Functions/Strategy%20and%20Corporate%20Finance/Our%20Insights/Five%20ways%20that%20ESG%20creates%20value/Five-ways-that-ESG-creates-value.ashx">studies</a> that show ESG factors drive consumer preference, and customers <a href="https://www.forbes.com/sites/gregpetro/2022/03/11/consumers-demand-sustainable-products-and-shopping-formats/">willing to pay a premium to go green</a>. As a result, many companies may try to emulate this success by exaggerating how environmentally sustainable they really are. Some companies resort to greenwashing as they come under pressure to comply with environmental industry standards or regulatory requirements. One such example is when <a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/business-34324772">Volkswagen admitted to cheating</a> government-required emissions tests by fitting various vehicles with “defeat devices.”   <h4>The rewards of being truly sustainable are sustainable</h4> What companies sometimes forget is that greenwashing is not sustainable (pun unintended). Those who greenwash risk getting exposed by an informed consumer or a gatekeeping group, which can backfire on the company’s reputation. A recent example would be when <a href="https://www.dezeen.com/2019/08/02/hm-norway-greenwashing-conscious-fashion-collection-news/">H&M launched its “green” clothing line called Conscious</a>. In this instance, the retailer claimed to use organic cotton and recycled polyester, but didn’t provide enough evidence to back up its marketing. The company then faced criticism for misleading claims In the case that the truth behind an organization’s greenwashing claims goes uncovered, it is still at a loss as it only enjoys the superficial benefits of being a “responsible” business. It doesn’t reap the added value that actual sustainable business can receive — like <a href="https://www.bain.com/insights/sustainability-your-brands-next-cost-saving-weapon/">lower operational costs</a>, <a href="https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2019/01/10/1686144/0/en/CGS-Survey-Reveals-Sustainability-Is-Driving-Demand-and-Customer-Loyalty.html">loyal customers</a>, or <a href="https://www.cfachicago.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Blog_-Managing-Risk-with-ESG-Investing.pdf">positive shareholder returns</a>.   <h4>Greenwashing faces legal implications in the future</h4> Most importantly, responsible ESG practices minimize regulatory and legal interventions, which in turn means less negative publicity and fines. This is exemplified in Volkswagen’s case, wherein the car manufacturer was fined $125 million for its emissions scandal, and saw further losses as a result of having to recall close to 12 million of its cars worldwide. The spiral translated into <a href="https://fortune.com/2020/10/06/volkswagen-vw-emissions-scandal-damages/">business losses</a> and <a href="https://fortune.com/2015/09/23/volkswagen-stock-drop/">negative shareholder returns</a>. The greenwashing crackdown will continue with new environmental laws being written. The <a href="https://research.hktdc.com/en/article/MTAzNDU1OTc0Nw">EU has decided to amend its new consumer rules</a> to address greenwashing concerns, requiring producers to provide greater transparency on product information to avoid misleading claims. The UK is also targeting greenwashing with the Competition and Markets Authority’s <a href="https://www.whitecase.com/publications/alert/uk-clampdown-greenwashing">Green Claims Code</a>. Organizations are driven towards greenwashing because of peer, consumer, or legal pressures. However, by doing so these businesses miss out on the true benefits of being sustainable.They also might expose themselves to the threat of legal action as more legislation is being drafted against greenwashing. As a result, these companies risk reputational damage, financial losses, and negative returns for stakeholders. Until regulators catch up to all the companies engaging in greenwashing, it’s up to us to be on the lookout for common greenwashing tactics, and stay fully informed about the purchases and investments we make.   ∙ ∙ ∙ The views expressed are those of the author at the time of writing, are not necessarily those of the firm as a whole and may be subject to change. The information contained in this advertisement is for informational purposes and should not be regarded as an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any. It does not constitute a recommendation or consider the particular investment objectives, financial conditions, or needs of specific investors. Investing involves risk, including the loss of principal. Past performance is not indicative or a guarantee of future performance. We do not provide tax, accounting, or legal advice to our clients, and all investors are advised to consult with their tax, accounting, or legal advisers regarding any potential investment. The information and any opinions contained in this advertisement have been obtained from sources that we consider reliable, but we do not represent such information and opinions are accurate or complete, and thus should not be relied upon as such. This is particularly true during periods of rapidly changing market conditions. Securities offered through Fennel Financials, LLC. Member <a href="https://www.finra.org/">FINRA</a> <a href="https://www.sipc.org/">SIPC</a>.

ESG

Environmental

What Is Greenwashing?

Greenwashing is a superficial and sometimes misleading way companies claim sustainability.

Shivani Hemnani

15 Aug, 2022

3 min read

Are you an investor who cares not only about the performance of your portfolio, but also how your investments affect the environment, society, or humanity as a whole? If you do, you’re not alone. There are many investors who invest based on their own morals, what they think is ethical, or to achieve a certain social goal. In fact, this type of investing is so popular that there are a handful of different terms that refer to the practice of aligning your investments with your values. You may have heard of impact investing, sustainable investing, socially-responsible investing, or ESG, but what do all these terms actually mean? And how do they differ?   Let’s define some of the commonly used terms:   ESG — Stands for <a href="https://fennel.com/fennel101/esg">Environmental, Social, and Governance</a>. A framework for assessing companies beyond solely financial data, by looking at that company’s impact on the environment, its impact on society, and how that company is organized. ESG is about better understanding a company by taking into account this information.   ESG investing — Involves incorporating ESG data in order to make investment decisions. Traditionally, ESG investing is <a href="https://fennel.com/blog/how-does-esg-relate-to-risk-management">viewed as a form of risk management</a>, where ESG is used to identify companies that are managed sustainably and avoid those that could face regulatory scrutiny. However, ESG investing is often grouped together with socially responsible investing or sustainable investing — even though technically those refer to different strategies.   Ethical investing — Using your personal code of ethics to determine what to invest in. This differs from investor to investor. One person may think ethical investing involves divesting from companies that test on animals, while another person may not care about animal testing and instead focus on avoiding companies that benefit from child labor.   Impact investing — According to the <a href="https://thegiin.org/impact-investing/need-to-know/#what-is-impact-investing">Global Impact Investing Network</a>, impact investing refers to making investments “with the intention to generate positive, measurable social and environmental impact alongside a financial return.” Impact investing is a broad term, but in order to qualify as impact investing the investor should have the desire to create a positive, the ability to measure that impact, the evidence to inform that investment decision, and the goal of also generating returns in the end.   Socially responsible investing (SRI) — Involves investing in something based on how that investment impacts the environment, society, or the greater good. The concept of SRI has been around for decades (at least) and is sometimes used interchangeably with ethical investing and sustainable investing.   Sustainable investing — According to <a href="https://online.hbs.edu/blog/post/sustainable-investing">Harvard Business School</a>, sustainable investing refers to “a range of practices in which investors aim to achieve financial returns while promoting long-term environmental or social value” — emphasis on long-term. Sustainable investing often is associated with investing in green energy or environmentally-friendly practices because the word “sustainable” is often used in that setting   Values-based investing — Similar to ethical investing, values-based investing involves making investment decisions based on a person’s own set of values. Sometimes those values reflect a person’s morals or religion, and other times they reflect a more generalized set of beliefs. Regardless of what those beliefs are, a values-based approach depends on the individual investor.    <h4>Which approach is best for you?</h4> After going through all of these terms, you may have noticed that there are a lot of similarities. Sometimes the differences between these approaches depend on the intention or end goal, other times it just comes down to semantics. Hopefully, next time you hear one of these terms get tossed around you’ll have a better understanding of what it means. This understanding may help you make your own investing decisions going forward.   * * * The views expressed are those of the author at the time of writing, are not necessarily those of the firm as a whole and may be subject to change. The information contained in this advertisement is for informational purposes and should not be regarded as an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any. It does not constitute a recommendation or consider the particular investment objectives, financial conditions, or needs of specific investors. Investing involves risk, including the loss of principal. Past performance is not indicative or a guarantee of future performance. We do not provide tax, accounting, or legal advice to our clients, and all investors are advised to consult with their tax, accounting, or legal advisers regarding any potential investment. The information and any opinions contained in this advertisement have been obtained from sources that we consider reliable, but we do not represent such information and opinions are accurate or complete, and thus should not be relied upon as such. This is particularly true during periods of rapidly changing market conditions. Securities offered through Fennel Financials, LLC. Member <a href="http://finra.org">FINRA</a> <a href="https://www.sipc.org/">SIPC</a>.

ESG

Investing

ESG vs SRI: What Do All the Terms Mean?

There are a lot of terms used in the world of impact investing, what do they all mean?

Fennel

01 Nov, 2022

2 min read

There are several different ways to incorporate <a href="https://fennel.com/fennel101/esg">ESG</a> into your portfolio, because ESG investing isn’t a one-size-fits-all approach. ESG investing involves using a company’s environmental, social, and governance data to guide investing decisions. But a lot of information falls into those three buckets, and which data points to focus on and how to use that data may vary from investor to investor. On top of that, different investors may have different reasons they’re using ESG. Maybe they hope to <a href="https://fennel.com/blog/how-does-esg-relate-to-risk-management">use ESG as a form of risk management</a>, by looking for long-term business viability and avoiding businesses that may face regulatory liabilities. Or maybe they want to use ESG to invest in companies that align with their personal values. One of the popular ways investors incorporate ESG data into their portfolios is through <a href="https://fennel.com/blog/how-does-esg-relate-to-risk-management">ESG screening</a>, which involves including or excluding companies based on their ESG performance. However, this approach differs from a technique many impact investment funds do — active ownership. Let’s examine these two different ESG investing approaches to better understand the pros and cons of each. <h4>The Positives and Negatives of Screening</h4> ESG screening comes in two different forms — positive screening and negative screening. Both approaches are relatively straightforward. Positive screening involves investing in companies based on certain ESG factors, while negative screening involves excluding companies from your portfolio or divesting. Positive and negative screening are really just two sides of the same coin, and can be done in tandem. In order to incorporate screening into your portfolio, all you need is relevant ESG data and a personal strategy of what you want to invest in or avoid. For example, if you want to construct a portfolio of women-led businesses, you need access to the gender breakdown of a company’s board of directors or leadership team. That way you can positively screen women-led companies into your portfolio. If you see that some of the companies already in your portfolio have no women in leadership positions, then you may want to negatively screen them out. Provided that you have the proper ESG data, it’s relatively easy to incorporate ESG into your portfolio this way. Screening can help investors who are using ESG from a risk management perspective. If they believe the global transition to renewable energy will benefit green energy companies and hurt traditional fossil fuel companies, they can use ESG screening to make sure their portfolio aligns with that hypothesis. Screening can also help investors who want to make sure their investments are aligned with their personal values. This sort of investing happens all the time, whether it’s <a href="https://fennel.com/blog/why-are-students-pushing-universities-to-divest">universities divesting from oil companies</a> after student pressure, protesters <a href="https://michiganintheworld.history.lsa.umich.edu/antivietnamwar/exhibits/show/exhibit/military_and_the_university/dow_chemical">divesting from napalm manufacturers</a> during the Vietnam War, or <a href="https://www.robeco.com/en/key-strengths/sustainable-investing/glossary/sin-stocks.html">religious investors divesting from “sinful” industries</a> like gambling or drug use. Screening is popular in <a href="https://financebuzz.com/values-based-investing">values-based investing</a> and <a href="https://www.nerdwallet.com/article/investing/ethical-investing">ethical investing</a>, which have both been around for a long time. But what if you’re an impact investor who wants to use their investment to promote some sort of change? Sure, positive screening may help promote the companies you do invest in, but negative screening can leave you out of the conversation for the companies you may want to change, which could create an echo chamber effect. That’s why some impact investors are turning to a more hands-on approach known as active ownership (or active engagement). <h4>What Is Active Ownership?</h4> Active ownership involves using one’s position as a shareholder to push a company towards positive change. This can be done through things like <a href="https://fennel.com/fennel101/shareholder-voting">shareholder voting</a>, attending annual shareholder meetings, putting forward shareholder proposals, and so on. A famous example of active ownership at work is Engine No. 1’s <a href="https://www.reuters.com/business/little-engine-no-1-beat-exxon-with-just-125-mln-sources-2021-06-29/">board takeover of ExxonMobil</a>. In 2020, Engine No. 1, a relatively unknown activist hedge fund, acquired a small stake in the oil giant ExxonMobil. Although Engine No. 1’s shares only represented about 0.02% of the company, the hedge fund was able to use its shareholder status to put forward a handful of shareholder proposals and nominate new members to Exxon’s board of directors. After getting support from large asset managers like BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street, Engine No. 1 was able to win <a href="https://engine1.com/transforming/articles/exxon-mobil-one-year-later/">three of Exxon’s board seats</a>. Why did Engine No. 1 care about winning board seats? The hedge fund had three main goals: to bring independent directors with energy experience to Exxon’s board, to promote better long-term capital allocation, and to implement a strategic plan for Exxon’s business in a world that is rapidly moving towards sustainability and decarbonization. Since Engine No. 1’s board takeover, Exxon has <a href="https://engine1.com/transforming/articles/exxon-mobil-one-year-later/">made several commitments</a> to lowering its greenhouse gas emissions and invested billions of dollars into low carbon solutions.   <h4>Implementing Active Ownership Into Your Portfolio</h4> Okay, so all you have to do to implement active ownership into your portfolio is target a multinational company, wage a months-long shareholder campaign, and get some of the largest asset managers in the world to support your cause? Well, not exactly. Screening may seem easy to incorporate into your portfolio because it just involves including or excluding companies based on ESG data. Active ownership may take a little bit more work, but it could be as simple as using your shares to vote. "If you're a shareholder of a company, you should be active. Active ownership is really important,” Yusuf George, Managing Director of Engine No. 1, said at <a href="https://medium.com/fennelapp/a-recap-of-socap-2022-875a0cc53fb">a recent SOCAP event</a>. “Part of the reason [Engine No. 1] talks so much about the energy sector, the transportation sector, and agriculture is because they account for about 75% of greenhouse gas emissions. We want to go where the problems are, because if we don't, nothing will change. And so we believe that it's really important to use any tool you have — it can be voting your shares, showing up at an annual general meeting, whatever tool you have to be an active owner is really important." As Yusuf George points out, leaning into the problem is important because it could help lead to change. While exclusionary screening may work for a risk management approach, active ownership may lead to a greater impact on the company. If your goal as an investor is to have an impact, then it could be worth it to use ESG data to identify opportunities for impact within a company. Then you could use your position as a shareholder to push for change with whatever tools you have — whether that’s voting, putting forward proposals, or just spreading awareness of issues.   Risk Disclosure: Responsible investing incorporates Environmental Social Governance (ESG) factors that may affect exposure to issuers, sectors, industries, limiting the type and number of investment opportunities available, which could result in excluding investments that perform well. ∙ ∙ ∙ The views expressed are those of the author at the time of writing, are not necessarily those of the firm as a whole and may be subject to change. The information contained in this advertisement is for informational purposes and should not be regarded as an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any. It does not constitute a recommendation or consider the particular investment objectives, financial conditions, or needs of specific investors. Investing involves risk, including the loss of principal. Past performance is not indicative or a guarantee of future performance. We do not provide tax, accounting, or legal advice to our clients, and all investors are advised to consult with their tax, accounting, or legal advisers regarding any potential investment. The information and any opinions contained in this advertisement have been obtained from sources that we consider reliable, but we do not represent such information and opinions are accurate or complete, and thus should not be relied upon as such. This is particularly true during periods of rapidly changing market conditions. Securities offered through Fennel Financials, LLC. Member <a href="http://finra.org/">FINRA</a> <a href="https://www.sipc.org/">SIPC</a>.

ESG

Shareholder Activism

Screening vs Active Ownership: Different Ways To Incorporate ESG Into Your Portfolio

Active ownership could help ESG investors push for more impactful change.

Fennel

28 Nov, 2022

4 min read

There is a growing number of investors who aren’t satisfied with just financial returns, they want to know that their investments are creating a better world. This desire to make change is at the core of impact investing. <a href="https://fennel.com/blog/esg-vs-sri-what-do-all-the-terms-mean">Impact investing</a> refers to when investments are made with the intention of generating positive and measurable social or environmental impacts. Typically, an investor will have an idea of what impact they want to have, and then seek out investments to create that impact. This could mean investing in renewable energy companies to promote decarbonization, investing in minority-led companies to promote the work of underrepresented groups, and so on. But what does this look like in practice? Here are a handful of impact investing examples for interested investors   <h4>Example #1: Impact investing in diverse founders</h4> So many startups rely on venture capital funding in order to get up and running. But where that VC cash flows isn’t always equitable. One study found that <a href="https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbesbusinesscouncil/2022/05/26/diversity-the-holy-grail-of-venture-capital/?sh=5b51cec34178">77% of VC dollars</a> go to startups led by white founders. In 2021, a record year for VC funding, <a href="https://news.crunchbase.com/diversity/vc-funding-black-founded-startups/">only 1.3%</a> of all U.S. venture and growth equity financing went to companies led by Black founders. Harlem Capital hopes to close that funding gap. Harlem Capital started in 2015 as a syndicate of angel investors, and evolved over the years into a fully-fledged VC firm. The company debuted with <a href="https://techcrunch.com/2019/12/02/diversity-focused-vc-fund-harlem-capital-debuts-with-40m/">its inaugural $40 million fund</a> in 2019 and plans to invest in 1,000 diverse founders over the course of 20 years. After using that $40M fund to invest in 23 companies, Harlem Capital raised <a href="https://harlem.capital/harlem-capital-134-million-fund/">a $134 million fund</a> to invest in even more diverse founders. These diverse founders are building an array of diverse solutions, from <a href="https://harlem.capital/portfolio/curu">credit platforms that provide wider access to loans</a>, to a <a href="https://harlem.capital/portfolio/agape">relationship wellness app for couples</a>, <a href="https://harlem.capital/portfolio/jobble">gig marketplace for independent workers</a>, and more.  “We fundamentally believe we are a venture fund with impact, not an impact fund. The way we generate impact is to give women and minority entrepreneurs ownership,” Harlem Capital managing partner Henri Pierre-Jacques told TechCrunch.   <h4>Example #2: Impact investing in the oil industry</h4> In late 2020, a small activist hedge fund called Engine No. 1 <a href="https://hbr.org/2021/01/can-a-tiny-hedge-fund-push-exxonmobile-towards-sustainability">acquired a $40 million stake</a> in oil giant ExxonMobil, worth about 0.02% of the company’s shares. The hedge fund then wrote <a href="https://reenergizexom.com/materials/letter-to-the-board-of-directors/">an open letter</a> to Exxon’s board of directors to explain why. In that letter, Engine No. 1 pointed out the ways that Exxon had been struggling and failed to deliver shareholder returns. It also pointed out a four-part strategy for fixing this: 1) refresh the board of directors with people who has experience in the energy industry 2) become more disciplined in managing long-term capital allocation 3) implement a plan for the business to thrive in a world pushing away from fossil fuels, and 4) realign management incentives with creating shareholder value. Engine No. 1 then nominated four new directors for Exxon’s board, and campaigned for them during proxy season. After gaining the support of some of Exxon’s largest shareholders, three out of four of those directors won seats on the board. After that, Exxon started <a href="https://engine1.com/transforming/articles/exxon-mobil-one-year-later/">making measurable advancements</a> towards its new goals. For example, the company committed $15B towards investing in low-carbon solutions over a six year span, announced new scope 1 and scope 2 greenhouse gas targets for 2030, added a low-carbon solutions business unit and got the former head of General Motors’ Cruise to lead it.   <h4>Example #3: Impact investing in response to apartheid </h4> Word about the injustices committed in apartheid-era South Africa spread across the world. While many South African groups fought for their rights, international organizations also joined in to show support in their own way.  By the 1970s and 80s, students at American universities <a href="https://www.universityofcalifornia.edu/news/how-students-helped-end-apartheid">were protesting in solidarity</a> with South African students. Although these American students were thousands of miles away, they thought they could help by pressuring their universities <a href="https://nvdatabase.swarthmore.edu/content/columbia-university-students-win-divestment-apartheid-south-africa-united-states-1985">to divest</a> from companies that supported the apartheid regime. By 1988, <a href="https://www.investopedia.com/articles/economics/08/protest-divestment-south-africa.asp">155 colleges</a> across the US and Canada had divested from South Africa. And soon this movement spread beyond universities. By the end of 1989, 26 states, 22 counties, and over 90 cities <a href="http://richardknight.homestead.com/files/uscorporations.htm">had also created policies</a> against companies doing business in South Africa. This pressure caused many US businesses to pull out of South Africa. From 1985 to 1990, over 200 US companies collectively pulled out of South Africa, resulting in <a href="https://www.investopedia.com/articles/economics/08/protest-divestment-south-africa.asp">a loss of $1 billion</a> in direct investment dollars. Other countries put pressure on their companies to pull out of South Africa too, and by the early 1990s, the South African economy was <a href="http://richardknight.homestead.com/files/uscorporations.htm">feeling the effects of capital flight</a>.   <h4>Example #4: Impact investing in Chicago</h4> Sometimes impact investing is most felt at the local level. The Chicago Community Trust is a foundation that connects philanthropic donors, local organizations, and generous individuals who want to use their money to create a positive impact within the Chicago community. In 2020, the foundation <a href="https://www.cct.org/press-releases/the-chicago-community-trust-launches-impact-investing-platform/">launched</a> an impact investing platform to help facilitate impact-driven investments. The platform also helps investors measure the impact of their contributions by showing if they help low-income neighborhoods, go to businesses run by minority or women owners, help provide affordable housing, or if they provide capital to sustainable energy initiatives.   <h4>Example #5: Impact investing in agricultural development</h4> Lots of people talk about ending world hunger, what are some ways to actually do that? According to Root Capital, by investing in agricultural enterprises in the developing world. Since 1999, Root Capital has been investing in agriculture businesses in Latin America, sub-Saharan Africa, and Southeast Asia. Not only does the organization supply capital, it also provides training to help these companies grow. In addition to creating more steady sources of food, Root Capital also aims to use its investments to help alleviate local poverty, protect the planet, and advance gender inclusion. To date, the organization has <a href="https://rootcapital.org/about-us/">distributed</a> $1.6 billion to over 750 clients, representing 2.3 million farmers and $4.6 billion in economic activity. Risks: Employing ESG strategies may not result in favorable investment performance. The returns on a portfolio consisting primarily of Environmental, Social and Governance (“ESG”) aware, diversity equity and inclusion (DEI), impact investing, or faith-based investments may be lower or higher than a portfolio that is more diversified or where decisions are based solely on investment considerations. Because ESG criteria exclude some investments, investors may not be able to take advantage of the same opportunities or market trends as investors that do not use such criteria. ∙ ∙ ∙ The views expressed are those of the author at the time of writing, are not necessarily those of the firm as a whole and may be subject to change. The information contained in this advertisement is for informational purposes and should not be regarded as an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any. It does not constitute a recommendation or consider the particular investment objectives, financial conditions, or needs of specific investors. Investing involves risk, including the loss of principal. Past performance is not indicative or a guarantee of future performance. We do not provide tax, accounting, or legal advice to our clients, and all investors are advised to consult with their tax, accounting, or legal advisers regarding any potential investment. The information and any opinions contained in this advertisement have been obtained from sources that we consider reliable, but we do not represent such information and opinions are accurate or complete, and thus should not be relied upon as such. This is particularly true during periods of rapidly changing market conditions. Securities offered through Fennel Financials, LLC. Member <a href="http://finra.org">FINRA</a> <a href="https://www.sipc.org/">SIPC</a>.

5 Impact Investing Examples: How Investors Push for Change

What does impact investing look like in practice?

Fennel

21 Dec, 2022

5 min read

By now, you may already know that some investors use <a href="https://fennel.com/fennel101/esg">environmental, social, and governance (ESG)</a> data to understand a company’s impacts outside of purely financial measurements. But companies pay attention to ESG too, and many try to shape their own ESG impact through something called an ESG policy.   Note: The returns on a portfolio consisting primarily of Environmental, Social and Governance (“ESG”) aware, impact investing, or faith-based investments may be lower or higher than a portfolio that is more diversified or where decisions are based solely on financial considerations. Because ESG criteria exclude some investments, investors may not be able to take advantage of the same opportunities or market trends as investors that do not use such criteria.   <h4>What is an ESG policy?</h4> An ESG policy is an official commitment that companies make in order to manage their ESG impacts. A company with an ESG policy will often set goals for how it wants its business to perform across environmental, social, and governance categories. Sometimes, a company will make several official commitments that fall into its ESG policy, like a “sustainability policy,” “sustainable development goals policy,” “corporate social responsibility policy,” or “governance policy.” Although these can be narrow in focus, commitments made in those guidances often affect a company’s overall ESG impact.   <h4>Why have an ESG policy?</h4> In the eyes of ESG advocates, adopting an ESG policy is simply good business practices. But there are a handful of reasons why a company may want to consider instituting an ESG policy. One reason is that it communicates to investors that the company is serious about ESG. Earlier this year, Bloomberg Intelligence analysts <a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/company/press/esg-may-surpass-41-trillion-assets-in-2022-but-not-without-challenges-finds-bloomberg-intelligence/">predicted</a> that global ESG assets could surpass $41 trillion in 2022. Although that number may be off due to this year’s downturn in the market, the report also predicted that number could grow to $50 trillion by 2025 — showing a growing interest in ESG by investors. A company may want to show its ESG worthiness to ESG conscious investors, so adopting an ESG policy could help do that. Another reason to adopt an ESG policy comes down to risk management. Traditionally, good performance across ESG categories <a href="https://fennel.com/blog/how-does-esg-relate-to-risk-management">has been linked</a> to minimizing a company’s exposure to business risks. How? Reducing exposure to fossil fuels can be useful in a rapidly decarbonizing world, adamantly avoiding polluting can help a business steer clear of government fines, appropriate employee management can help companies attract new talent and stay away from scandals, and proper governance can help prevent fraud. Scenarios like these show tangible business reasons for adopting ESG policies — beyond simply “feeling good” about one’s impact.   <h4>What does an ESG policy look like in practice?</h4> It should be no surprise that many of the largest publicly traded companies have already instituted ESG policies. Let’s take a look at some of them to understand what an ESG policy looks like in practice. (Note: the companies included in this list have been picked due to their large market capitalization. This should not be seen as an endorsement of whether or not to invest.)   Microsoft Instead of outwardly calling out a singular ESG policy, tech giant Microsoft discloses <a href="https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/corporate-responsibility">its several commitments to corporate social responsibility</a>. These commitments include <a href="https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/corporate-responsibility/sustainability">a policy on environmental sustainability</a>, which outlines plans to be carbon and waste neutral by 2030, replenish more water than it uses by 2030, as well as a handful of other environmental actions. Microsoft’s CSR strategy also <a href="https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/corporate-responsibility">highlights a handful of social policies</a>, including commitments inclusive to economic growth, protecting fundamental human rights, and earning trust from Microsoft’s customers, employees, and communities. And lastly, Microsoft’s governance policy <a href="https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/Investor/corporate-governance/framework.aspx">establishes a framework</a> for the company’s board of directors to operate under. When all of these commitments are looked at in tandem, they represent a pretty comprehensive ESG policy.   Apple Apple puts together an ESG report every year for its investors. Although an ESG report isn’t exactly the same as an ESG policy — ESG reports detail past progress, while ESG policies are guidelines that are future-facing — the company’s annual report includes many commitments to ESG factors. Apple calls out its specific values in <a href="https://s2.q4cdn.com/470004039/files/doc_downloads/2022/08/2022_Apple_ESG_Report.pdf">the 2022 ESG report</a>, which include accessibility, education, environment, inclusion and diversity, privacy, and supplier responsibility — stating that these values are central to its “ESG approach.” More specifically, the company has also published its policies on things like <a href="https://s2.q4cdn.com/470004039/files/doc_downloads/gov_docs/2020/Apple-Human-Rights-Policy.pdf">human rights</a> and <a href="https://www.apple.com/supplier-responsibility/pdf/Apple_SR_2022_Progress_Report.pdf">doing business with suppliers</a>.   Alphabet Alphabet, the parent company of Google and YouTube (among others), details its ESG policies on its <a href="https://abc.xyz/investor/other/sustainability-and-related-information/">investors relations site</a>. Among these policies are commitments to data security, employee diversity, environmental sustainability, supply chain responsibility, as well as reports disclosing ESG data across its businesses. Alphabet also made a splash when it issued $5.75 billion in sustainability bonds, and in 2022 it <a href="https://www.gstatic.com/gumdrop/sustainability/alphabet-2022-sustainability-bond-impact-report.pdf">outlined</a> how this money will be spent — on things like clean energy, circular economy, affordable housing, and commitments to racial equity. Amazon Amazon has <a href="https://sustainability.aboutamazon.com/">a website</a> dedicated to its sustainability efforts across the environment, society, and its governance. On this page, it calls out several of the commitments it has made. This includes its plans to <a href="https://sustainability.aboutamazon.com/environment/renewable-energy?energyType=true">use 100% renewable energy by 2025</a>, its efforts to <a href="https://sustainability.aboutamazon.com/environment/packaging">create more sustainable packaging</a>, the <a href="https://sustainability.aboutamazon.com/society/employees">benefits it offers to employees</a>, and more.   <h4>What do these ESG policies have in common and how do they differ?</h4> After going through the ESG policies of a handful of companies, you may notice how some of them are similar while others are unique. ESG policies are designed based on the individual operations of a business. That’s why Amazon has a policy about making its packaging more sustainable, while Apple has a policy about how it chooses suppliers for its hardware. These policies help businesses develop more sustainable practices and help set themselves up for success over the long term. They also tell investors and the world that these companies are being proactive about ESG.   ∙ ∙ ∙ The views expressed are those of the author at the time of writing, are not necessarily those of the firm as a whole and may be subject to change. The information contained in this advertisement is for informational purposes and should not be regarded as an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any. It does not constitute a recommendation or consider the particular investment objectives, financial conditions, or needs of specific investors. Investing involves risk, including the loss of principal. Past performance is not indicative or a guarantee of future performance. We do not provide tax, accounting, or legal advice to our clients, and all investors are advised to consult with their tax, accounting, or legal advisers regarding any potential investment. The information and any opinions contained in this advertisement have been obtained from sources that we consider reliable, but we do not represent such information and opinions are accurate or complete, and thus should not be relied upon as such. This is particularly true during periods of rapidly changing market conditions. Employing ESG strategies may not result in favorable investment performance. Securities offered through Fennel Financials, LLC. Member <a href="http://finra.org/">FINRA</a> <a href="https://www.sipc.org/">SIPC</a>.

ESG

What Is an ESG Policy? How Are They Used?

Proactive companies prioritize ESG in their business practices.

Fennel

11 Jan, 2023

4 min read

In today’s tech-focused world, it seems like people’s actions are constantly scrutinized. With this level of self-awareness people often wonder, “Am I doing the right thing?” With existential threats like climate change and social inequality, there is pressure on the individual to contribute back to society, and to speak up for social issues. We eat less meat, take shorter showers, and turn up the thermostat to address our environmental impact. We also watch what we say on social media to address our social impact. Though sometimes we find ourselves (fairly) asking the following question — how do we even know our actions are helping the world around us? Is there any way to quantify the impact of our prudent practices? People aren’t the only ones asking themselves these questions. Many businesses and organizations strive to do the right thing, and look for the right tools to measure their impact. This is especially important because the scale of certain businesses can lead to much greater impacts than the actions taken by individuals. Before we get into the details of this, let’s first understand what “social impact” actually means. Social impact can be defined as the effect of an organization or individual’s actions that brings upon a value-adding change in a community, as a result of attempting to address a social challenge (things like systemic hunger, poverty, or inequality linked to certain demographics). However, it is important to note that pushing for positive change doesn’t always happen in a vacuum. For example, a government pushing to create more jobs for its people can end up causing adverse environmental impacts if it ends up giving grants to companies that do not carry out their business practices in a sustainable manner. As individuals, one way to make informed decisions that create social impact is by opting for products of companies that operate and manage their supply chain in a responsible manner. Many consumers already abide by this, as <a href="https://csis.upenn.edu/news/what-is-social-impact-anyways/">a recent survey</a> found that 90% of millennials are likely to buy products from brands with a “cause” when choosing between two brands of equal quality and price. This shows incentive for businesses to align themselves with such causes. It’s relatively easy for us as individuals to make “greener” shopping decisions in order to support sustainable brands. But individuals can take their support a level further through <a href="https://fennel.com/blog/esg-vs-sri-what-do-all-the-terms-mean">socially responsible investing</a>, which involves investing in companies that work to create positive social or environmental impacts. <a href="https://www.financemagnates.com/forex/what-do-retail-investors-really-think-about-esg-investing/">A survey of DIY traders and investors published by Capital.com</a> found that more than half of the respondents had never selected an investment based on <a href="https://fennel.com/fennel101/esg">environmental, social, and governance (ESG)</a> criteria, with only 7% citing social and environmental reasons as part of their investment strategy. This shows that socially responsible and ESG investing has yet to really take off, potentially showing opportunity for growth. People know that they want to do good, and mission-driven businesses mirror this desire. However, there is still much to be done. Luckily, there are steps that both groups can take in order to create a positive impact. And as long as people work towards these goals, they can hope to make a difference.   ∙ ∙ ∙ The views expressed are those of the author at the time of writing, are not necessarily those of the firm as a whole and may be subject to change. The information contained in this advertisement is for informational purposes and should not be regarded as an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any. It does not constitute a recommendation or consider the particular investment objectives, financial conditions, or needs of specific investors. Investing involves risk, including the loss of principal. Past performance is not indicative or a guarantee of future performance. We do not provide tax, accounting, or legal advice to our clients, and all investors are advised to consult with their tax, accounting, or legal advisers regarding any potential investment. The information and any opinions contained in this advertisement have been obtained from sources that we consider reliable, but we do not represent such information and opinions are accurate or complete, and thus should not be relied upon as such. This is particularly true during periods of rapidly changing market conditions. Employing ESG strategies may not result in favorable investment performance. Securities offered through Fennel Financials, LLC. Member <a href="http://finra.org/">FINRA</a> <a href="https://www.sipc.org/">SIPC</a>.

Social

ESG

How People and Businesses Strive to Create Social Impact

Social impact doesn't always happen in a vaccum.

Shivani Hemnani

02 Feb, 2023

3 min read

When investors want to understand the way a market is performing, they often look at a market index. An index is a tool that is used to measure the performance of a certain group of assets, typically by taking the weighted average of those assets in order to create a representative sample. There are many different types of indices. One that has been in the news a lot recently is the <a href="https://www.bls.gov/cpi/#:~:text=The%20Consumer%20Price%20Index%20(CPI,U.S.%20and%20various%20geographic%20areas.">Consumer Price Index</a>, which measures the average price change over time for a select group of consumer goods and services. People have been paying attention to this index because it provides a useful way to measure inflation in the US, especially in terms of how it’s felt by your average consumer. Some other indices you may have heard of are the <a href="https://www.britannica.com/topic/SandP-500">S&P 500</a> and <a href="https://www.britannica.com/topic/Dow-Jones-average">Dow Jones Industrial Average</a>, which both measure stock market performance by looking at either a group of 500 American publicly traded companies (S&P 500) or a basket of 30 industrial stocks (DJIA). Indices are popular tools to help track markets, regardless of whether those markets are broad or more niche. So it should come as no surprise that some investors use ESG indices in order to follow the performance of companies that prioritize their <a href="https://fennel.com/fennel101/esg">environmental, social, and governance</a> practices.   <h4>What is an ESG index?</h4> An ESG index is a collection of stocks of companies that exhibit high ESG performance. Like other indices, an ESG index is designed to act as a market benchmark, specifically for companies that prioritize ESG within their business operations. These ESG indices can help investors track high-performing ESG companies, compare those companies to the broader market, or provide an investment opportunity through an affiliated ETF or mutual fund. ESG indices are often put together by a company that provides its own ESG rating system, or by a financial institution that tracks the market. Each ESG index has its own method of picking stocks to be included, rebalancing over time, weighing underlying assets, and taking averages. So each ESG index provides a unique benchmark.   Here are some examples of different ESG indices, as well as what makes them unique. (This list is intended for educational purposes only, and should not be seen as an endorsement to invest. Employing ESG strategies may not result in favorable investment performance.)   S&P 500 ESG Index S&P Global’s S&P 500 index provides a market cap-weighted index of 500 large publicly traded companies. As mentioned before, it’s a popular index for investors who want a snapshot of the US stock market. But to turn the S&P 500 into an ESG index, S&P Global analyzed its list of 500 companies to find the top ESG performers and filter out the companies involved in controversial weapons, tobacco, coal production, or companies that had disqualifying UN Global Compact scores. As of 2022, around 300 of the original 500 companies are included in the S&P 500 ESG index. This makes the S&P 500 ESG index a more exclusive list than its parent index. And since the S&P 500 ESG index has significant overlap with the S&P 500, some investors like to compare the two indices to see if companies that prioritize ESG actually outperform their counterparts.   S&P SmallCap 600 ESG Index Similar to how S&P Global took its S&P 500 benchmark and refined it using an ESG lens, the organization did the same thing for its index tracking small cap companies. While the S&P 500 tracks 500 public companies with large market capitalizations, the S&P SmallCap 600 index tracks companies with a market capitalization between $850 million and $3.7 billion. So the S&P SmallCap 600 ESG index uses S&P Global’s same methodology to pick out the top ESG performers from the SmallCap index and exclude companies involved in controversial practices. S&P Global actually has <a href="https://www.spglobal.com/spdji/en/documents/methodologies/methodology-sp-esg-index-series.pdf">a number of different ESG indices</a> that it creates by refining one of its parent indices, or by compiling different ESG indices to create a composite index. These indices are meant to provide benchmarking for companies based on their market cap, geography, and more (as well as their ESG performance).   Refinitiv/S-Network ESG Best Practices Indices ESG data provider Refinitiv has developed a handful of ESG indices that fall under its Refinitiv/S-Network ESG Best Practices Indices umbrella. This includes the Refinitiv/S-Network US Large-Cap ESG Best Practices Index, Refinitiv/S-Network US Large-Cap Environmental Best Practices Index, Refinitiv/S-Network US Large-Cap Social Best Practices Index, Refinitiv/S-Network US Large-Cap Governance Best Practices Index, Refinitiv/S-Network Emerging markets ESG Best Practices Index, and a handful of others. These indices take the ESG rating system developed by Refinitiv and S-Network in order to provide a benchmark that tracks the top ESG performers. Altogether, these indices represent over 11,000 companies, which have been analyzed across more than 630 ESG performance indicators.   The Refinitiv Global Resource Protection Select Index While the Refinitiv/S-Network ESG Best Practices Indices look at ESG performance across more than 630 indicators, the Refinitiv Global Resource Protection Select Index narrows its scope by focusing on companies that perform well under Refinitiv’s “Resource Use” category. This means that companies included in the index have displayed efforts to reduce their materials, energy, or water usage, as well as made an effort to implement more sustainable efforts in their supply chain management.   MSCI USA ESG Select Index Morgan Stanley Capital International put together its MSCI USA ESG Select Index by compiling companies with positive environmental, social, and governance factors that display similar risk and returns metrics to its more broad MSCI USA Index. The index is designed to maximize exposure to ESG factors by providing more weight to companies with high ESG ratings, and less to companies with low ESG ratings.   MSCI KLD 400 Social Index An honorable mention goes to the MSCI KLD 400 Social Index, which evolved from the Domini 400 Social Index — one of the oldest ESG indices that still exists. The Domini 400 Social Index was created in 1990, over a decade before the term “ESG” <a href="https://www.euromoney.com/article/294dqz2h1pqywgbyh3zls/esg/the-united-nations-free-thinkers-who-coined-the-term-esg-and-changed-the-world">was coined</a>. This index was designed to track companies suitable for the “socially-responsible investing” movement, and has since evolved to incorporate the more standardized criteria that ESG provides.   Morningstar Global Markets Sustainability Index Financial services company Morningstar has a handful of ESG indices. Among them is its Morningstar Global Markets Sustainability Index, which is designed to reduce the risk caused by issues related to poor performance in environmental, social, and governance factors. Companies included in the list are from the Morningstar Global Markets Large-Mid Index.   Nasdaq-100 ESG Index The Nasdaq-100 ESG Index is an ESG screened version of the Nasdaq-100, which is a basket of 100 of the largest companies traded on the Nasdaq stock exchange. In order to turn the Nasdaq-100 Index into the Nasdaq-100 ESG Index, the financial organization says it looks at 15 potentially problematic areas of business and excludes them from the ESG index. But Nasdaq also admits that most of the companies in the Nasdaq-100 parent index take ESG seriously. So only 6% of companies in the original index get filtered out to create the Nasdaq-100 ESG Index.   ∙ ∙ ∙ The views expressed are those of the author at the time of writing, are not necessarily those of the firm as a whole and may be subject to change. The information contained in this advertisement is for informational purposes and should not be regarded as an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any. It does not constitute a recommendation or consider the particular investment objectives, financial conditions, or needs of specific investors. Investing involves risk, including the loss of principal. Past performance is not indicative or a guarantee of future performance. We do not provide tax, accounting, or legal advice to our clients, and all investors are advised to consult with their tax, accounting, or legal advisers regarding any potential investment. The information and any opinions contained in this advertisement have been obtained from sources that we consider reliable, but we do not represent such information and opinions are accurate or complete, and thus should not be relied upon as such. This is particularly true during periods of rapidly changing market conditions. Employing ESG strategies may not result in favorable investment performance. Securities offered through Fennel Financials, LLC. Member <a href="http://finra.org/">FINRA</a> <a href="https://www.sipc.org/">SIPC</a>.

ESG

Investing

ESG Index: What Is It and What Are Some Examples?

An ESG index can help you track the performance of certain ESG-vetted companies over time.

Fennel

22 Feb, 2023

5 min read

<a href="https://fennel.com/blog/proxy-season-2023-is-coming-up-heres-what-you-need-to-know" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Proxy season 2023</a> is coming up, which means investors are getting ready to exercise their rights as shareholders and vote on important business decisions. But before the annual general meetings of 2023 really kick off, let’s take a look back at last year and pick out some of the trends we saw in proxy season 2022. That way, we might have a better idea of what to expect in 2023. Here are some of the highlights from last year’s proxy season:   There was a record number of shareholder proposals in 2022 If your favorite part of proxy season is voting on shareholder proposals, 2022 was your year. Last year broke records in not only the number of shareholder proposals that were submitted to public companies, but also the number of proposals that made it to the ballot and were voted on. According to <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2022/10/27/boardroom-recap-the-2022-proxy-season/">a PricewaterhouseCoopers study</a>, there were 555 shareholder proposals among Russell 3000 companies that were voted on — a 25% increase compared to the previous year. The study says that this is the result of two factors. One, a 17% increase in the number of shareholder proposals that were submitted to these companies. And two, a 40% decrease in no-action requests granted by the SEC (these requests allow companies to drop certain shareholder proposals from their proxy statements). With this record number of proposals being voted on, a record number of proposals also received the majority of votes.   Lots of these proposals centered around ESG issues In this record year of shareholder proposals, there were plenty that were related to ESG. Proxy Preview Project <a href="https://www.spglobal.com/marketintelligence/en/news-insights/latest-news-headlines/record-number-of-shareholder-esg-proposals-in-2022-defies-gop-political-backlash-71181308">found</a> 607 instances of shareholder resolutions related to ESG topics in the first half of 2022, which it said was a 22% increase from the year before. This uptick came despite the fact that a 2020 SEC rule made it relatively harder to file and refile shareholder proposals. "The attempt to silence shareholder voices has, instead, prompted them to get louder," Andrew Behar, CEO of As You Sow, wrote in <a href="https://www.proxypreview.org/2022/report-blog">the Proxy Preview report</a>. "This uprising is occurring while investors and fiduciaries increasingly understand that systemic risk affects all players in the capital markets, inspiring leading companies onto the path of serving all stakeholders."   Some of the top ESG issues were: DEI, climate change, and political spending While governance issues remained a popular topic for shareholder proposals, there number of shareholder proposals surrounding environmental and social issues almost doubled among Russell 3000 companies, according to the PwC study mentioned before. However, the study points out that only 41 of the 288 E and S related proposals received the majority of votes. This is a slight uptick from the 36 proposals that got the majority of votes in 2021, but still represents a decline in the percentage of proposals reaching the majority benchmark. The study found that the number of environment-related proposals doubled compared to the year before. These proposals included topics like measuring direct emissions, climate risk management, measuring indirect emissions, and implementing sustainable packaging. Proposals that dealt with direct emissions like greenhouse gas emissions and net-zero targets were more likely to pass (7 out of 14 did) than proposals that dealt with indirect emissions The study also found that shareholder proposals asking for racial equity audits were surprisingly popular, with average support going from 33% in 2021 to 45% in 2022. 8 out of 22 of these proposals passed with the majority of votes. These environmental and social trends build off of what we’ve seen in the past few years. US SIF <a href="https://www.ussif.org//Files/Trends/2022/Trends%25202022%2520Executive%2520Summary.pdf">analyzed</a> shareholder proposals spanning 2020 to 2022 and found that the issues that prompted the most proposals were: labor and equal employment opportunity (with 311 proposals), corporate political activity (with 288 proposals), and climate change (with 265 proposals).   Notable vote: Jack in the Box’s sustainable packaging Speaking of breaking records, one especially notable vote came from the shareholders of Jack in the Box. Investor Green Century Funds put together a shareholder proposal asking Jack in the Box to speed up its sustainable packaging efforts, arguing that the company had fallen behind the sustainable packaging initiatives of other fast food companies. What makes this vote notable is that it passed with 95% of the vote despite Jack in the Box recommending that shareholders vote against it. This is <a href="https://www.greencentury.com/majority-of-jack-in-the-box-shareholders-support-green-century-packaging-proposal/">the largest margin</a> that an environmental- or social-related proposal has passed with a company opposing it — showing that certain investors really care about environmental impact, and are willing to push companies that drag their feet on these issues.   Investors paying close attention to governance Environmental and social issues were in the spotlight, but so was governance. According to <a href="https://www.ey.com/en_us/board-matters/four-key-takeaways-from-the-2022-proxy-season#accordion-content-1941053843-0">EY</a>, shareholders asked for more board oversight and disclosures when it came to ESG issues, and some companies responded by citing ESG in director qualifications. EY also notes that despite the signals that activist investors would challenge more company-picked board nominations, the opposition only went up by a small percentage. The average vote against S&P 500 directors was 4.2% in 2022, which was only up a little bit compared to the 3.9% average in 2021.   Say on pay decline One particularly interesting trend in governance is the decrease in support for company “say on pay” votes. If you look at previous proxy years, you’ll notice that in general, say on pay votes received overwhelming support. But that may be starting to chip away. According to PwC, “Average support at companies in the S&P 500 and Russell 3000 hit record lows since the vote was introduced 11 years ago, at 87% and 90% respectively. In the S&P 500, 21 companies failed their say-on-pay vote, with 207 companies receiving below 70% support. The number of failed votes at Russell 3000 companies hit 71.” While 70% may still seem like a high percentage of the vote, this represents a stark contrast when compared to before. This trend is exemplified by the controversy surrounding Apple’s 2022 say on pay vote for its CEO Tim Cook. Last year, Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS), one of the largest proxy advisory firms, <a href="https://www.reuters.com/technology/apple-shareholder-iss-urges-vote-against-ceo-cooks-bonus-2022-02-16/">asked Apple investors to vote against</a> Tim Cook’s compensation, saying there were issues with how his equity was awarded. Apple’s say on pay vote still received a majority with 64% approval, but this was down from 95% in 2021. In response, Cook <a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2023/01/12/apple-ceo-tim-cook-receives-a-40percent-pay-cut-after-shareholder-vote.html">voluntarily cut his own salary by 40%</a> at the start of 2023. This is potentially a big deal, because if Tim Cook isn’t safe from say on pay opposition — the same Tim Cook that leads the largest US company by market cap, that grew his company’s share price by around 1,000% since becoming CEO in 2011 — this could have big implications for the compensation of other CEOs if their shareholders believe they are being unfairly paid. It could be interesting to see how support for say on pay changes in 2023, or if it changes at all. But all of these trends from 2022 could be worth keeping an eye on in 2023. These trends could just be symptoms of what investors are thinking about during a specific year, or they could be hinting at a larger movement.   • • • The views expressed are those of the author at the time of writing, are not necessarily those of the firm as a whole and may be subject to change. The information contained in this is for informational purposes and should not be regarded as an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any. It does not constitute a recommendation or consider the particular investment objectives, financial conditions, or needs of specific investors. Investing involves risk, including the loss of principal. Past performance is not indicative or a guarantee of future performance. We do not provide tax, accounting, or legal advice to our clients, and all investors are advised to consult with their tax, accounting, or legal advisers regarding any potential investment. The information and any opinions contained in this advertisement have been obtained from sources that we consider reliable, but we do not represent such information and opinions are accurate or complete, and thus should not be relied upon as such. This is particularly true during periods of rapidly changing market conditions. Employing ESG strategies may not result in favorable investment performance. Securities offered through Fennel Financials, LLC. Member<a href="http://finra.org/"> FINRA</a><a href="https://www.sipc.org/"> SIPC</a>.

Shareholder Activism

ESG

Investing

Highlights From Proxy Season 2022

Let's take a look back at some of the things that happened during last year's AGM season.

Fennel

21 Mar, 2023

5 min read

Want to invest in bonds while having a positive impact on the world? It may be time to get familiar with green bonds, social impact bonds, and sustainability bonds. As a quick recap, <a href="https://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/bond.asp">bonds</a> are essentially loans or IOUs that provide the borrower (such as governments or corporations) with external funds to finance long-term goals. When a person invests in a bond, they’re basically loaning money to that borrower, who will pay back the principal amount plus interest over time. An example of this would be municipal bonds, which local governments issue to finance essential services such as infrastructure projects. Similar to how <a href="https://fennel.com/fennel101/esg">environmental, social, and governance (ESG)</a> has taken over the stock market, impact investors are looking for ways to promote environmental or social good with their investments into the debt market (i.e. bonds). This has led to new asset classes like green, social, and sustainability bonds. Let’s look into these three types of bonds.   Green Bonds A green bond is a type of financial instrument that lends money to finance projects that are meant to help the environment. <a href="https://www.eib.org/attachments/fi/eib-cab-sab-presentation.pdf">The first AAA-rated green bonds</a> were issued in 2007 by the European Investment Bank and World Bank. This capital funded both renewable energy and energy efficiency projects with the goal of climate change mitigation. Since market inception, the green-labeled bond market has ballooned to over $1 trillion cumulative issuance with an average <a href="https://www.climatebonds.net/market/explaining-green-bonds">annual growth rate of 95%</a>. Green bonds are wildly popular and robust, channeling funding towards things like electric transportation infrastructure, research & development of low-carbon technologies, water supply management, wastewater collection and treatment, pollution prevention and control, protection and restoration of biodiversity and ecosystems, and sustainable forest management. There’s even a subcategory of green bonds called “blue bonds” that focuses on clean water and ocean ecosystem preservation/restoration. In one of the first green bond issuances of 2023, <a href="https://www.reuters.com/markets/rates-bonds/hong-kong-raises-58-bln-green-bonds-term-sheets-2023-01-05/">Hong Kong</a> announced that it raised $5.8 billion in green bonds, which is intended to fund the sustainable economic development of the region. Not a bad start to the year.   Social Impact Bonds Social impact bonds are like green bonds, except instead of providing funding to environmental initiatives, they are meant to finance social services and drive positive social outcomes. Geoff Mulgan, then CEO of Young Foundation, is credited with coining the term “<a href="https://efinancemanagement.com/investment-decisions/social-impact-bonds">social impact bond</a>.” The<a href="https://www.oecd.org/cfe/leed/UnderstandingSIBsLux-WorkingPaper.pdf"> first social impact bond</a> launched in 2010 by United Kingdom-based Social Finance Ltd. with the goal of reducing recidivism (which is when someone who served prison time commits another crime). Since then, the market has <a href="https://www.pimco.com/en-us/resources/education/understanding-green-social-and-sustainability-bonds/">expanded the range of possibilities for social impact bonds</a>, addressing issues facing low-income people and the unemployed, migrants, women and/or marginalized genders, people with disabilities, displaced persons, and other communities in need. Social impact bonds finance actions such as improving food security and sustainable food systems, piloting programs around socioeconomic advancement, building affordable housing, increasing access to essential services, and building affordable basic infrastructure. While not as prevalent as green bonds, the market for social impact bonds is still rapidly growing. <a href="https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Impact_Bonds-Brief_1-FINAL.pdf">Brookings reported</a> that as of July 2020, at least 194 social impact bonds have been contracted in 33 different countries, representing over $421 Million in upfront investment and over $460 Million in total outcome funding committed.   Sustainability Bonds You can think of sustainability bonds as a combination of green and social impact bonds. Sustainability bonds finance projects that have both positive environmental and social outcomes. The United Nations <a href="https://sdgs.un.org/goals%23history">17 Sustainable Development Goals</a>, adopted by member states in 2015, takes a systems-approach to conceptualizing the interlinking social and environmental themes we need to collectively address in order to achieve peace and prosperity for people and the planet. Sustainable bonds support projects in multiple SDG areas. From <a href="https://www.environmental-finance.com/content/the-green-bond-hub/the-2020s-the-decade-of-sustainable-bonds.html">2017 to 2023</a>, we saw a massive increase in sustainable bond issuance from $200 billion to nearly $1.5 trillion. The green, social, and sustainability bond markets are experiencing rapid growth, and thus have to deal with some growing pains, grappling with finding standardized policies and procedures around transparency, impact measurement, and reporting. But the growth of these bonds are exciting, as they potentially offer a new asset class for impact investors to look into.     Risk Considerations: There is no assurance that a Portfolio will achieve its investment objective. Portfolios are subject to market risk, which is the possibility that the market values of securities owned by the Portfolio will decline and that the value of Portfolio shares may therefore be less than what you paid for them. Market values can change daily due to economic and other events (e.g. natural disasters, health crises, terrorism, conflicts and social unrest) that affect markets, countries, companies or governments. It is difficult to predict the timing, duration, and potential adverse effects (e.g. portfolio liquidity) of events. Accordingly, you can lose money investing in this Portfolio. Please be aware that this Portfolio may be subject to certain additional risks. Fixed income securities are subject to the ability of an issuer to make timely principal and interest payments (credit risk), changes in interest rates (interest-rate risk), the creditworthiness of the issuer and general market liquidity (market risk). In a rising interest-rate environment, bond prices may fall and may result in periods of volatility and increased portfolio redemptions. In a declining interest-rate environment, the portfolio may generate less income. Longer-term securities may be more sensitive to interest rate changes. ESG strategies that incorporate impact investing and/or Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) factors could result in relative investment performance deviating from other strategies or broad market benchmarks, depending on whether such sectors or investments are in or out of favor in the market. As a result, there is no assurance ESG strategies could result in more favorable investment performance.   ∙ ∙ ∙ The views expressed are those of the author at the time of writing, are not necessarily those of the firm as a whole and may be subject to change. The information contained in this advertisement is for informational purposes and should not be regarded as an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any. It does not constitute a recommendation or consider the particular investment objectives, financial conditions, or needs of specific investors. Investing involves risk, including the loss of principal. Past performance is not indicative or a guarantee of future performance. We do not provide tax, accounting, or legal advice to our clients, and all investors are advised to consult with their tax, accounting, or legal advisers regarding any potential investment. The information and any opinions contained in this advertisement have been obtained from sources that we consider reliable, but we do not represent such information and opinions are accurate or complete, and thus should not be relied upon as such. This is particularly true during periods of rapidly changing market conditions. Employing ESG strategies may not result in favorable investment performance. Securities offered through Fennel Financials, LLC. Member <a href="http://finra.org/">FINRA</a> <a href="https://www.sipc.org/">SIPC</a>.

Green, Social Impact, and Sustainability Bonds are Financing Public Benefit

Want to invest in bonds while having a positive impact on the world?

Sultan White

30 Mar, 2023

4 min read

MBA programs are a breeding ground for future business leaders, so analyzing the trends that pop up in business schools across the country can give us a window into the direction the corporate world is heading. So what’s one growing trend we see? Sustainability. As the demand for sustainable business practices continues to grow, business schools are increasingly incorporating sustainability into their curricula. Teaching sustainable business in higher education equips students with the skills to address environmental and social challenges in their future careers and drive the transition to a more sustainable economy. It is difficult to determine which business school was the first to offer courses in sustainability as many schools have been incorporating sustainability into their curricula for several decades. One of the earliest programs to offer courses in sustainability was the <a href="https://erb.umich.edu/about/">Erb Institute for Global Sustainable Enterprise at the University of Michigan</a>. The Erb Institute was founded in 1996 through a partnership between the School of Natural Resources and Environment and the Ross School of Business. The program offers a dual-degree MBA/MS in Natural Resources and Environment, with a focus on sustainable business practices. Another early program was the <a href="https://aces.kenaninstitute.unc.edu/about-us/">Center for Sustainable Enterprise at the Kenan-Flagler Business School at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill</a>. The center was established in 1999 and offers courses and programs that focus on sustainability, corporate social responsibility, and environmental management. <a href="https://www.presidio.edu/about/">Presidio Graduate School in San Francisco</a>  was also an early pioneer in sustainability education and today is recognized as one of the most prestigious institutions cultivating the next generation of changemakers. Presidio Graduate School was founded in the early 2000s and offers MBA programs with a focus on sustainability and social entrepreneurship. Since then, many other business schools have followed suit and incorporated sustainability into their curricula. And in recent years, business schools have seen <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2021/11/13/business/dealbook/business-schools-esg.html">a growing interest in ESG</a> from students.   <h4 class="p1">Why teach sustainability in business schools?</h4> Today's consumers are increasingly aware of the environmental and social impacts of the products and services they buy, and they are demanding more sustainable options. So a business school degree that emphasizes sustainability can help companies appeal to these consumers. The <a href="https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/mk/Documents/about-deloitte/2021-deloitte-global-millennial-survey-report.pdf">2021 Deloitte Global Millennial and Gen Z Survey</a> found that over a quarter of respondents consider a company's environmental and social impact when making purchasing decisions and <a href="https://www.firstinsight.com/white-papers-posts/gen-z-shoppers-demand-sustainability">First Insight’s annual surveys</a> uncovered a rising trend that consumers across all generations—from Baby Boomers to Gen Z—are willing to pay more for sustainable products. Investors are also increasingly looking for companies that have strong environmental and social performance, as some believe that this can be an indicator of long-term financial success. The <a href="https://thegiin.org/research/publication/impinv-survey-2020/">Global Impact Investing Network's Annual Impact Investor Survey</a> found that assets under management in the impact investing industry grew to $715 billion in 2020. On top of that, regulators are tightening environmental and social regulations, which can create new opportunities and challenges for businesses. The <a href="https://www.greenbiz.com/report/2021-state-green-business-report">2021 State of Green Business report by GreenBiz</a> found that 58% of companies surveyed believed that regulation was a driver of their sustainability initiatives. By incorporating sustainability into the curriculum, business schools can prepare students to meet these regulatory demands and help businesses navigate this rapidly evolving landscape. Teaching sustainable business practices can also help business schools differentiate themselves from their peers and <a href="https://www.uab.edu/reporter/campus/sustainability/item/9853-faculty-student-interest-drives-expansion-of-sustainability-curriculum">attract students who are passionate about sustainability as well as faculty who are passionate about teaching it</a>. Additionally, employers are increasingly looking for candidates who have sustainability knowledge and skills, as this can be a competitive advantage in today's job market. In fact, green job postings have increased by <a href="https://www.fastcompany.com/90831379/green-jobs-are-up-237-in-the-last-5-years-here-are-4-ways-to-boost-your-skills-and-get-hired">237% in the last 5 years</a>. To effectively teach sustainable business practices, business schools must take a comprehensive approach that includes both core courses and electives. Core courses should cover the fundamental concepts and principles of sustainability, including environmental science, social and ethical issues, and sustainability frameworks. Electives should provide students with opportunities to explore sustainability in greater depth and develop skills in specific areas, such as sustainable operations, social entrepreneurship, or sustainability reporting. Often, business schools engage with external stakeholders, such as industry partners and community organizations, to build partnerships and collaborative initiatives such as internships and capstone projects. And sometimes those initiatives help partners develop sustainability goals. An example of a group that does this is the Global Engagement Committee of the <a href="https://bacademics.org/">Global B Corp Academic Community</a> (B Academics). This organization works to advance the state of academic study into business as a force for good. The committee recently released a <a href="https://bacademics.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/White-paper-B-Academics-2-1.pdf">white paper</a> which presents academic initiatives aimed at accelerating the transition to a new economy, specifically through promoting teaching and research on B Corporations and sustainable business. The aim of the white paper is to share how these efforts have emerged and evolved and their different models, challenges and learning processes. Global initiatives such as B Academics and the <a href="https://www.unprme.org/">United Nations’ Principles for Responsible Management Education</a> are standardizing and legitimizing the way we teach sustainable business in higher education across the world, indicating that business schools will continue to be catalysts for a new class of professionals.     ∙ ∙ ∙ The views expressed are those of the author at the time of writing, are not necessarily those of the firm as a whole and may be subject to change. The information contained in this advertisement is for informational purposes and should not be regarded as an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any. It does not constitute a recommendation or consider the particular investment objectives, financial conditions, or needs of specific investors. Investing involves risk, including the loss of principal. Past performance is not indicative or a guarantee of future performance. We do not provide tax, accounting, or legal advice to our clients, and all investors are advised to consult with their tax, accounting, or legal advisers regarding any potential investment. The information and any opinions contained in this advertisement have been obtained from sources that we consider reliable, but we do not represent such information and opinions are accurate or complete, and thus should not be relied upon as such. This is particularly true during periods of rapidly changing market conditions. Securities offered through Fennel Financials, LLC. Member FINRA SIPC.

Business Schools Are Ushering In a New Era of Sustainability

A growing number of future business leaders are learning about sustainability in their MBA programs.

Sultan White

08 Jun, 2023

5 min

How Does ESG Relate to Risk Management?

Integrating ESG in business practices doubles as good risk management, which goes on to generate brand equity for companies and attract investors.

It's the Social and Governance factors that actually push away the risks.

Expand your knowledge further

Take back the power of your investment